Limestone calcined clay cement as a low carbon solution to meet expanding cement demand in emerging economies.

dc.contributor.authorCancio Díaz, Yudiesky
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Berriel, Sofía
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Machado, Inocencio Raúl
dc.contributor.authorMartirena Hernández, José Fernando
dc.contributor.authorHeierly, Urs
dc.contributor.authorFavier, Aurélie
dc.contributor.authorScrivener, Karen
dc.contributor.authorHabert, Guillaume
dc.contributor.departmentUniversidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villasen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFederal Institute of Technology ETHZurichen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFederal Institute of Technology EPFL Lausanneen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMSD Consulting GmbH, Berneen_US
dc.coverage.spatialSuizaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T20:32:14Z
dc.date.available2019-03-13T20:32:14Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-15
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims at assessing the economic, environmental and social feasibility of five investment alternatives for the Cuban cement industry in a long-term horizon appraisal (15 years). Anticipated growing demand for cement, constrained supply and an urgent need for optimisation of limited capital while preserving the environment, are background facts leading to the present study. This research explores the beneficial contribution of a new available technology, LC3 cement, resulting from the combination of clinker, calcined clay and limestone, with a capacity of replacing up to 50% of clinker in cement. Global Warming Potential (GWP) is calculated with Life Cycle Assessment method and the economic investment’s payback is assessed through Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) approach. Main outcomes show that projected demand could be satisfied either by adding new cement plants–at a high environmental impact and unprofitable performance– or by introducing LC3 strategy. The latter choice allows boosting both the return on investment and the production capacity while reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions up to 20-23% compared to business-as-usual practice. Overall profitability for the industry is estimated to overcome BAU scenario by 8 to 10 percentage points by 2025, if LC3 were adopted. Increasing the production of conventional blended cements instead brings only marginal economic benefits without supporting the needed increase in production capacity. The conducted study also shows that, in spite of the extra capital cost required for the calcination of kaolinite clay, LC3 drops production costs in the range of 15-25% compared to conventional solutions.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCancio, Y., Sánchez, S., Sánchez, I.R., Martirena, J.F. , Heierly, U., Favier, A., Scrivener, K.,Habert, G (2017). Limestone calcined clay cement as a low carbon solution to meet expanding cement demand in emerging economies. Development Engineering, No. 2, pp. 82-91. ISSN: 2352-7285. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.deveng.2017.06.001en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.deveng.2017.06.001en_US
dc.identifier.issn2352-7285en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.uclv.edu.cu/handle/123456789/10907
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.journalDevelopment Engineeringen_US
dc.rightsEste documento es Propiedad Patrimonial de la Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas. Los usuarios podrán hacer uso de esta obra bajo la siguiente licencia: Creative Commons: Atribución-No Comercial-Compartir Igual 4.0 Licenseen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villasen_US
dc.source.endpage91en_US
dc.source.initialpage82en_US
dc.source.issue2017en_US
dc.source.volume2en_US
dc.subjectCement, Alternative, ROCE, CO2, LCA, Investmenten_US
dc.subject.otherEconomía Industrialen_US
dc.subject.otherIndustrial Economicsen_US
dc.subject.otherMateriales de Construcciónen_US
dc.subject.otherConstruction Materialsen_US
dc.titleLimestone calcined clay cement as a low carbon solution to meet expanding cement demand in emerging economies.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.article1en_US

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2017 Artículo Yudiesky en Development Engineering.pdf
Tamaño:
1.03 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.33 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: