Enlarging simple ecological models:subspecies, hidden symmetries and thei implications
Archivos
Fecha
2019
Autores
Martín González, Osmel
Pérez Díaz, Noel
Cárdenas Ortiz, Rolando Pedro
Horvath, J.E.
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Springer
Resumen
Some basic principles to enlarge simple ecological models and the role
of nonlinearities are discussed. The inclusion of internal groups and the new
dynamic possibilities associated with this procedure are considered in the context of
the logistic model. According to our results, processes like the success or extinction
of a particular group without affecting the global population are not necessarily
linked to the impact of environmental changes or the supremacy of a determined
group or subspecies. In our case, the uniformity, the success or extinction of a
particular group into a global population may be seen as the possibility to achieve
or not a typical symmetry-breaking process. Such possibilities arise associated with
the degree of nonlinearity contributions and the specificities of the interaction
network in the model. Other elements linked with the ecological interaction, the
role of symmetries and the phenomenological nature of ecological modelling are
also discussed.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Ecological Modelling, Subspecies, Symmetry, Symmetry Breaking
Citación
Citar según la fuente original:
Schmolke A et al (2010) Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: a strategy for the future. Trends Ecol Evol 25(8):479–486
Grimm V et al (2014) Towards better modelling and decision support: documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE. Ecol Model 280:129–139
Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40(1):677–697
Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12(5):361–371
Kreuzer M, Tribsch A, Nyffeler R (2014) Ecological and genetic differentiation of two subspecies of Saussurea alpina in the Western Alps. Alp Bot 124(1):49–58
Gleiser M, Thorarinson J (2006) Prebiotic homochirality as a critical phenomenon. Orig Life Evol Biosph 36(5):501–505
Li R, Bowerman B (2010) Symmetry breaking in biology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2(3):a003475
Borile C et al (2012) Spontaneously broken neutral symmetry in an ecological system. Phys Rev Lett 109(3):038102
Sayama H, Kaufman L, Bar-Yam Y (2000) Symmetry breaking and coarsening in spatially distributed evolutionary processes including sexual reproduction and disruptive selection. Phys Rev E 62(5):7065–7069
Price RIA et al (2016) Symmetry breaking in mass-recruiting ants: extent of foraging biases depends on resource quality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70(11):1813–1820
Djouadi A (2008) The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking: Tome I: The Higgs boson in the Standard Model. Phys Rep 457(1–4):1–216
Gabrielli E et al (2014) Towards completing the standard model: vacuum stability, electroweak symmetry breaking, and dark matter. Phys Rev D 89(1):015017
Kratina P et al (2009) Functional responses modified by predator density. Oecologia 159(2):425–433
Morozov AY (2010) Emergence of Holling type III zooplankton functional response: bringing together field evidence and mathematical modelling. J Theor Biol 265(1):45–54
Millstein RL (2009) Populations as individuals. Biol Theory 4(3):267–273
Patten MA (2015) Subspecies and the philosophy of science. Auk 132(2):481–485
Stein BA et al (2013) Preparing for and managing change: climate adaptation for biodiversity and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11(9):502–510
Longo G, Montévil M (2011) From physics to biology by extending criticality and symmetry breakings. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 106(2):340–347
Goryachev AB, Leda M (2017) Many roads to symmetry breaking: molecular mechanisms and theoretical models of yeast cell polarity. Mol Biol Cell 28(3):370–380