Campo científico desarrollo local en Latinoamérica. Un análisis desde su producción científica
Fecha
2019-06-19
Autores
Barroso Suárez, Yaneisy
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas
Resumen
La bibliometría como disciplina puede develar aspectos que desde la producción de conocimientos tienen lugar en campos científicos. El desarrollo local en Latinoamérica no ha sido objeto de estudio como campo científico. La ausencia de fuentes no permite identificar los enfoques y cualidades del desarrollo que mayor presencia tienen en la región. Por otra parte, no se evidencian fuentes que relacionen la aplicación de la bibliometría como enfoque para la sociología del conocimiento y el análisis de campos científicos. Para ello se plantean como objetivos: 1) examinar los referentes teóricos metodológicos que permitan identificar las características del campo científico desarrollo local en Latinoamérica, 2) definir los aspectos metodológicos que permitan describir el desarrollo local como campo científico en Latinoamérica y 3) caracterizar el comportamiento del desarrollo local como campo científico en Latinoamérica desde el 2008 hasta el 2018. Para la obtención de resultados se emplean métodos en los niveles teóricos y empírico, fundamentalmente el método bibliométrico como forma de describir los campos científicos. Se concluye que en Latinoamérica el desarrollo local es abordado desde diferentes perspectivas que van desde lo económico hasta enfoques humanos. Es un campo científico que se encuentra poco desarrollado con índices de colaboración bajos e índices de transitoriedad elevados. Los países dominantes en el campo son México, Brasil, Colombia y Argentina. Las revistas e instituciones dominantes pertenecen a los países más productivos. Lo anterior permite concluir que el campo científico no muestra distinciones en cuanto a enfoques emergentes y dominantes en la ciencia.
Bibliometrics as a discipline can reveal aspects that from the production of knowledge take place in scientific fields. Local development in Latin America has not been studied as a scientific field. The absence of sources does not allow identifying the development approaches and qualities that have the greatest presence in the region. There are no sources are found that relate the application of bibliometrics as an approach to the sociology of knowledge and the analysis of scientific fields. The objectives of the study were: 1) to examine the methodological theoretical references that allow the identification of the characteristics of the scientific field of local development in Latin America, 2) to define the methodological aspects that allow to describe local development as a scientific field in Latin America and 3) to characterize the behavior of local development as a scientific field in Latin America from 2008 to 2018. o obtain results, methods are used at the theoretical and empirical levels, fundamentally the bibliometric method as a way to describe the scientific fields. It is concluded that in Latin America local development is approached from different perspectives that go from economic to human approaches. It is a scientific field that is underdeveloped with low collaboration rates and high transience indexes. The dominant countries in the field are Mexico, Brazil, Colombia and Argentina. Magazines and dominant institutions belong to the most productive countries. This allows us to conclude that the scientific field does not show distinctions in terms of emergent and dominant approaches in science.
Bibliometrics as a discipline can reveal aspects that from the production of knowledge take place in scientific fields. Local development in Latin America has not been studied as a scientific field. The absence of sources does not allow identifying the development approaches and qualities that have the greatest presence in the region. There are no sources are found that relate the application of bibliometrics as an approach to the sociology of knowledge and the analysis of scientific fields. The objectives of the study were: 1) to examine the methodological theoretical references that allow the identification of the characteristics of the scientific field of local development in Latin America, 2) to define the methodological aspects that allow to describe local development as a scientific field in Latin America and 3) to characterize the behavior of local development as a scientific field in Latin America from 2008 to 2018. o obtain results, methods are used at the theoretical and empirical levels, fundamentally the bibliometric method as a way to describe the scientific fields. It is concluded that in Latin America local development is approached from different perspectives that go from economic to human approaches. It is a scientific field that is underdeveloped with low collaboration rates and high transience indexes. The dominant countries in the field are Mexico, Brazil, Colombia and Argentina. Magazines and dominant institutions belong to the most productive countries. This allows us to conclude that the scientific field does not show distinctions in terms of emergent and dominant approaches in science.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Desarrollo Local, Bibliometría, Pierre Bourdieu, Teoría de los Campos, Campo Científico, América Latina, Local Development, Bibliometrics, Pierre Bourdieu, Field Theory, Scientific Field, Latin America